Search Engine Performance: Is OK Good Enough?

Writing by Nick Stamoulis on Monday, August 13, 2007

(Source) I think that many major companies, including the search engines, have fallen victim to this issue. But because consumers think that the engines are doing a good job (heck, a better job than HOSPITALS!), there’s no demand for the engines to provide more relevant results. Do SEMs think the engines could do a better job? I think most do. But it doesn’t matter what we think — it matters what the consumers — the users — think and how they react to the engines. Until then, OK will likely be good enough.

This is something I haven’t considered before. If the average searcher thinks search engines are doing a good enough job then we may never get better results from the search engines. But is the average searcher qualified to make that judgment?

Think about how many searches you make each day. Is it 5? 10? 30? Or 1?

I believe most people - the average searcher - only makes 1 or 2 searches a day, and that not even every day. But the average search engine marketer and search engine optimizer makes far more searches per day than the average searcher. People in the industry make no less than 10 searches per day every single day.

I have no statistics or study to back that up. But I believe it is a good guess. Only there is more of us than there are of them (SEMs and SEOs vs. average searchers). Not that this is an us vs. them game. It isn’t. But I would hope that search engines have the sense to put more stock in the opinions of those who use their services most often.

Imagine it this way: You drive automobiles, right? I’m sure you do. What if GM or Ford took a survey of automobile users and asked them “Are you satisfied with the total performance of all the automobiles you drive?” Well, there are many factors that affect automobile performance, some of them you probably can’t explain unless you are involved the manufacturing of automobiles or the maintenance of them. But the surveyor asks you the question and you say, “Sure, I’m happy with the performance I get from my 2007 Taurus.” It gets you to work everyday, right?

Well, let’s continue with our analogy. Your next door neighbor is an auto mechanic. He drives lots of cars, right. Every time a customer brings in a vehicle for him to work on he has to drive it around the block to - what? - check it’s performance. Do you think he’ll have a different perspective? I’m sure he will.

Now, the average automobile user is probably happy with the overall performance of the car or truck they drive to and from work every day. On average, they may crawl behind the steering wheel of their vehicles two or three times a day. But an auto mechanic likely gets behind the wheel of a vehicle more often than that. If he works on 10 cars a day and he drives each one around the block then he uses automobiles 3 or 4 times as often as the average driver.

This isn’t a perfect analogy, I know. But I do believe it has some validity. The number of times you use a product gives you more chances to evaluate it on the criteria that are important to its performance. That’s why I think search engines should seek out the feedback from SEOs and SEMs who work with their services multiple times daily versus the average searcher who only uses the services once a day. It makes sense to me. What about you?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Affordable Internet Marketing Services, including SEO, Pay Per Click, Blog Marketing & More! For More Info Call Expert Nick Stamoulis at: 877-295-0620.

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon
Receive Updates For The Search Engine Optimization Journal

                      Category: Search Engines                      

Read similar posts in Search Engines

3 Comments

Comment by Larry Ludwig

Made Monday, 13 of August , 2007 at 11:32 pm

Nick, I don’t have data to back it up either, but I’m sure you’re right about SEO industry professionals running far more searches than the average. 10 daily might be low-balling it.
And, it’s not just the raw number of searches - we drill down on site content, site structure, linking strategies, partners, use of meta data and on until we see source code with our eyes shut.
I would have enjoyed hearing your opinions on what ways SEs fail, what ways they succeed, and how they might be improved.
Tackle that one in the days ahead and I’ll chime in.

Comment by namecritic

Made Tuesday, 14 of August , 2007 at 3:23 am

I have a question for people to comment on regarding the search engines.

they say google has 60% of the searches. I see nowhere that says they actually have 60% of the users.

What I mean is this. More advanced users use google. advanced users search way more times per day than the average potential customer.

Since msn is the default start page for most users, with aol being next, then many changing to yahoo in a short amount of time, can anyone show me proof that more actual users use google?

Again, not the most searches, the most users.

Comment by Nick Stamoulis

Made Tuesday, 14 of August , 2007 at 8:03 am

OK, Larry, thanks for your input. I intentionally low-balled the number since I didn’t have hard data at my fingertips. You are right, SEOs, serious researchers, and journalists tend to dig the deepest in the search for information.

Ways the SEs succeed and fail? You’re on. :-)

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Search Engine Optimization Journal is an SEO Blog that discusses Search Engine Marketing, Search Engine Ranking and Positioning for the new and advanced reader.
Learn more about this SEO blog.