<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Social Bookmarking Build Links?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Journal is an SEO Blog that contains usefule articles, tips, resources and news about SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/comment-page-1/#comment-40438</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=1716#comment-40438</guid>
		<description>@vancolleys - Sure, here is my 2 cents:  Focus much less on page rank and user experience, good quality content and building your business and website online as a long term effort...good things will happen if you take this patient approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@vancolleys &#8211; Sure, here is my 2 cents:  Focus much less on page rank and user experience, good quality content and building your business and website online as a long term effort&#8230;good things will happen if you take this patient approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vancolleys</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/comment-page-1/#comment-40399</link>
		<dc:creator>vancolleys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=1716#comment-40399</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your info… Very very very helpfull… my site otodidak.info (PR 1 in 7 mont.. fyuughhh).. any advice please…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your info… Very very very helpfull… my site otodidak.info (PR 1 in 7 mont.. fyuughhh).. any advice please…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/comment-page-1/#comment-29457</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=1716#comment-29457</guid>
		<description>Chris, your argument is the same argument so-called gurus use to say that links from low-PR nonrelevant sites don&#039;t matter and that everyone should seek links only from high-PR relevant sites. It doesn&#039;t matter if you multiply 100 by 1 or 10 by 10, you get the same answer.

Yes, a lot of votes from one social bookmarking site will get you a lot of Google traction, but life isn&#039;t all about making Google happy. There are a variety of methods that still work for link building. Just about every social media site online gives link juice from profile pages. It is a valid strategy to set up profiles at these sites and never use them. For one thing, it prevents your enemies from using your brand to do so then damaging your reputation by using your profile to spam. But that&#039;s another issue.

I&#039;ve found that anything I spend time on is beneficial if there is more than one purpose to it. Social media marketing and SEO should be dual prongs on the same fork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, your argument is the same argument so-called gurus use to say that links from low-PR nonrelevant sites don&#8217;t matter and that everyone should seek links only from high-PR relevant sites. It doesn&#8217;t matter if you multiply 100 by 1 or 10 by 10, you get the same answer.</p>
<p>Yes, a lot of votes from one social bookmarking site will get you a lot of Google traction, but life isn&#8217;t all about making Google happy. There are a variety of methods that still work for link building. Just about every social media site online gives link juice from profile pages. It is a valid strategy to set up profiles at these sites and never use them. For one thing, it prevents your enemies from using your brand to do so then damaging your reputation by using your profile to spam. But that&#8217;s another issue.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that anything I spend time on is beneficial if there is more than one purpose to it. Social media marketing and SEO should be dual prongs on the same fork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/comment-page-1/#comment-29455</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=1716#comment-29455</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, nofollow means nothing. NOTHING. At least on social sites. Votes, that is what matters. Forget about links and think social participation. That is what Google values way more that a bunch of spam links you created your self.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, nofollow means nothing. NOTHING. At least on social sites. Votes, that is what matters. Forget about links and think social participation. That is what Google values way more that a bunch of spam links you created your self.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/comment-page-1/#comment-29454</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=1716#comment-29454</guid>
		<description>Nick, forget all this waste of time. What matters is one submission done right and lots of votes. Spamming all these sites with bookmarks that only get one vote (yours) is a waste or your time.

I did a case study of how social promotion done right works and I used my latest client in a 13 days to Google walk thru. Everything done for this site is listed, no blackhat stuff, nothing hidden, just the full story.

http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=258

This is how it is done. Not with all those sites up there. Adding bookmarks to all those sites is spam. Google counts how many bookmark a site in each bookmarking site.

Lots of bookmarks, lots of votes, great indicator to Google.

One bookmark by you, that is spam and Google knows it.

Forget this spammy crap and participate in one social bookmarking site highly or just forget bookmarking. I have a Digg analytics solution that cuts your time by 3 hours a day.

It only takes 30 minutes in the am and 30 minutes at nite. If you can&#039;t devote this time to being a real user, don&#039;t come to sites we participate in. We will simply report you for spam.

Real users that take their time to actually participate do not tolerate someone who just shows up to add their stuff and then bails.

I would rather have NO social bookmarks than ones I created and have 0 votes. I think that is a negative indicator in Google&#039;s eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, forget all this waste of time. What matters is one submission done right and lots of votes. Spamming all these sites with bookmarks that only get one vote (yours) is a waste or your time.</p>
<p>I did a case study of how social promotion done right works and I used my latest client in a 13 days to Google walk thru. Everything done for this site is listed, no blackhat stuff, nothing hidden, just the full story.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=258" rel="nofollow">http://www.keywebdata.com/?p=258</a></p>
<p>This is how it is done. Not with all those sites up there. Adding bookmarks to all those sites is spam. Google counts how many bookmark a site in each bookmarking site.</p>
<p>Lots of bookmarks, lots of votes, great indicator to Google.</p>
<p>One bookmark by you, that is spam and Google knows it.</p>
<p>Forget this spammy crap and participate in one social bookmarking site highly or just forget bookmarking. I have a Digg analytics solution that cuts your time by 3 hours a day.</p>
<p>It only takes 30 minutes in the am and 30 minutes at nite. If you can&#8217;t devote this time to being a real user, don&#8217;t come to sites we participate in. We will simply report you for spam.</p>
<p>Real users that take their time to actually participate do not tolerate someone who just shows up to add their stuff and then bails.</p>
<p>I would rather have NO social bookmarks than ones I created and have 0 votes. I think that is a negative indicator in Google&#8217;s eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/comment-page-1/#comment-29132</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=1716#comment-29132</guid>
		<description>Janet, SU doesn&#039;t pass link juice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet, SU doesn&#8217;t pass link juice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Meiners Thaeler</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2008/11/07/social-build-links/comment-page-1/#comment-29131</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Meiners Thaeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=1716#comment-29131</guid>
		<description>How about &lt;a href=&quot;http://delicious.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Delicious&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://sphinn.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sphinn&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stumbleupon.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stumbled Upon&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about <a href="http://delicious.com/" rel="nofollow">Delicious</a>, <a href="http://sphinn.com/" rel="nofollow">Sphinn</a> and <a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/" rel="nofollow">Stumbled Upon</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

