<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Google Friend Connect Improve Your Search Rankings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/01/06/friend-connect-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/01/06/friend-connect-rankings/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Journal is an SEO Blog that contains usefule articles, tips, resources and news about SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/01/06/friend-connect-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-32442</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=2621#comment-32442</guid>
		<description>@Sid Burgess, thanks for the good word. As far as navigation it is intentional. Those pages are part of the five step tutorial so I wanted to hide them just a bit. Once you know they are there links to them are fine. But I am building a list as part of this as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sid Burgess, thanks for the good word. As far as navigation it is intentional. Those pages are part of the five step tutorial so I wanted to hide them just a bit. Once you know they are there links to them are fine. But I am building a list as part of this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/01/06/friend-connect-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-32441</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=2621#comment-32441</guid>
		<description>What we have yet to know is how much link juice Google is going to pass to us thru Google Reader shared items links.

I believe it is going to pass on link juice depending on how many people SHARE the item. Certainly not the power for an incoming link from a domain to a domian. 

However the fact that so few are using it and the ones that are, are the most informed and bleading edge tech adopters and influencers there are. Who is the heaviest user of Reader shared items? Robert Scoble. Chris Brogan. Arrington. Enough said.

If you Google &quot;Google Friend Connect Tutorial&quot; you will see a guy with 20 Diggs outranking me for the term. Will he stay there, no because it is rehased material and he won&#039;t build any links.

What is real interesting Nick is that Google is changing and moving things around in odd fashon. My latest post explains why somethings seem to be there and then gone on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we have yet to know is how much link juice Google is going to pass to us thru Google Reader shared items links.</p>
<p>I believe it is going to pass on link juice depending on how many people SHARE the item. Certainly not the power for an incoming link from a domain to a domian. </p>
<p>However the fact that so few are using it and the ones that are, are the most informed and bleading edge tech adopters and influencers there are. Who is the heaviest user of Reader shared items? Robert Scoble. Chris Brogan. Arrington. Enough said.</p>
<p>If you Google &#8220;Google Friend Connect Tutorial&#8221; you will see a guy with 20 Diggs outranking me for the term. Will he stay there, no because it is rehased material and he won&#8217;t build any links.</p>
<p>What is real interesting Nick is that Google is changing and moving things around in odd fashon. My latest post explains why somethings seem to be there and then gone on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/01/06/friend-connect-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-30830</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=2621#comment-30830</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  You may consider putting your home button in a more visible place. :) It took me a minute to find it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  You may consider putting your home button in a more visible place. <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It took me a minute to find it. <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

