<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Sitelinks The New PageRank?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Journal is an SEO Blog that contains usefule articles, tips, resources and news about SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/comment-page-1/#comment-57571</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=4358#comment-57571</guid>
		<description>Hi Queensland - This is a very good point, if a someone builds a 5 page site then the Google sitelinks feature has no choice but to use all 5 pages...thanks for reading and your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Queensland &#8211; This is a very good point, if a someone builds a 5 page site then the Google sitelinks feature has no choice but to use all 5 pages&#8230;thanks for reading and your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queensland</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/comment-page-1/#comment-57541</link>
		<dc:creator>Queensland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=4358#comment-57541</guid>
		<description>Obviously sitelinks give you an insight on which pages Google thinks the site is beneficial. It wont take long before everyone is making sites 5 pages deep only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously sitelinks give you an insight on which pages Google thinks the site is beneficial. It wont take long before everyone is making sites 5 pages deep only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/comment-page-1/#comment-39701</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=4358#comment-39701</guid>
		<description>@Bithika - Sure, I will keep everyone updated as I learn more about this and find out how the Google sitelinks impact optimization for the long term...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bithika &#8211; Sure, I will keep everyone updated as I learn more about this and find out how the Google sitelinks impact optimization for the long term&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithika</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/comment-page-1/#comment-39689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=4358#comment-39689</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick

I request you to keep updating more info as you get it; just waiting to see what Sitelinks really mean for SEO.

Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick</p>
<p>I request you to keep updating more info as you get it; just waiting to see what Sitelinks really mean for SEO.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/comment-page-1/#comment-39629</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=4358#comment-39629</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sam for the research!  You nailed it on the head :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sam for the research!  You nailed it on the head <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/comment-page-1/#comment-39624</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=4358#comment-39624</guid>
		<description>Nick,
I was tickled by your post and checking uncle G for explanation, here it is:
&quot;Sitelinks are additional links Google sometimes generates from site contents in order to help users navigate your site. Google generates these sitelinks periodically from your site&#039;s contents.
Because we generate sitelinks dynamically, this list can change from time to time. Sitelinks are completely automated, and we show them only if we think they&#039;ll be useful to the user. If your site&#039;s structure doesn&#039;t allow our algorithms to find good sitelinks, or we don&#039;t think that the sitelinks are relevant to the user&#039;s query, we won&#039;t show them. However, we are always working to improve how we find and display sitelinks.&quot;

To me, the key phrase is &quot;useful to the user&quot;. I guess it only mean one thing; Average Time on Site. The longer your user stay, the better in the eye of uncle G. What this mean for SEO campaign? of course &quot;good and useful content&quot;. No secret huh?

Light me up Nick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,<br />
I was tickled by your post and checking uncle G for explanation, here it is:<br />
&#8220;Sitelinks are additional links Google sometimes generates from site contents in order to help users navigate your site. Google generates these sitelinks periodically from your site&#8217;s contents.<br />
Because we generate sitelinks dynamically, this list can change from time to time. Sitelinks are completely automated, and we show them only if we think they&#8217;ll be useful to the user. If your site&#8217;s structure doesn&#8217;t allow our algorithms to find good sitelinks, or we don&#8217;t think that the sitelinks are relevant to the user&#8217;s query, we won&#8217;t show them. However, we are always working to improve how we find and display sitelinks.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me, the key phrase is &#8220;useful to the user&#8221;. I guess it only mean one thing; Average Time on Site. The longer your user stay, the better in the eye of uncle G. What this mean for SEO campaign? of course &#8220;good and useful content&#8221;. No secret huh?</p>
<p>Light me up Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/04/17/google-sitelinks/comment-page-1/#comment-39615</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=4358#comment-39615</guid>
		<description>@ Joshua - Thanks for the comment...we shall see what happens in the near future...

@ Robert Brady - Thanks for the question...I think time will tell and other SEO folks will need to look at this type of information as well.  As soon as I see any studies or data from a credible source on click behavior, then I will highlight this for everyone for sure!

@ Robert - This is an analogy, since Page Rank for so long was a spammers paradise and as we all know it is not a true measurement of a successful SEO campaign...it should be interesting to see how spammers try testing different sitelinks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Joshua &#8211; Thanks for the comment&#8230;we shall see what happens in the near future&#8230;</p>
<p>@ Robert Brady &#8211; Thanks for the question&#8230;I think time will tell and other SEO folks will need to look at this type of information as well.  As soon as I see any studies or data from a credible source on click behavior, then I will highlight this for everyone for sure!</p>
<p>@ Robert &#8211; This is an analogy, since Page Rank for so long was a spammers paradise and as we all know it is not a true measurement of a successful SEO campaign&#8230;it should be interesting to see how spammers try testing different sitelinks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

