<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links Aren&#8217;t As Important As You Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Journal is an SEO Blog that contains usefule articles, tips, resources and news about SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/comment-page-1/#comment-50939</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5339#comment-50939</guid>
		<description>@Dustin Radin - Very true, I think it will always remain a combination of factors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dustin Radin &#8211; Very true, I think it will always remain a combination of factors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Radin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/comment-page-1/#comment-50911</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Radin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5339#comment-50911</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion...it reminds me that search engines don&#039;t want &lt;b&gt;one&lt;/b&gt; factor that can be consistently duplicated to gain high organic rankings. Whenever such a factor is discovered it gets abused (i.e.- meta tags, keyword stuffing, links, no follow) and Google quickly intercedes to stop the manipulation. Its a whole combination of factors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion&#8230;it reminds me that search engines don&#8217;t want <b>one</b> factor that can be consistently duplicated to gain high organic rankings. Whenever such a factor is discovered it gets abused (i.e.- meta tags, keyword stuffing, links, no follow) and Google quickly intercedes to stop the manipulation. Its a whole combination of factors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/comment-page-1/#comment-50754</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5339#comment-50754</guid>
		<description>@Stacey Morgan Smith - Great point, building links naturally is the name of the game!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stacey Morgan Smith &#8211; Great point, building links naturally is the name of the game!  <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Morgan Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/comment-page-1/#comment-50747</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Morgan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5339#comment-50747</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s crazy to pursue quality links anyway if your site has poor content, duplicate page titles, and slow loadtime.

A pleasant side effect of onpage SEO is that a site then builds links naturally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s crazy to pursue quality links anyway if your site has poor content, duplicate page titles, and slow loadtime.</p>
<p>A pleasant side effect of onpage SEO is that a site then builds links naturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/comment-page-1/#comment-50542</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5339#comment-50542</guid>
		<description>@Shadab Malik - Very good point, domain age is very important since this impacts the trust factor in the eyes of the search engines...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shadab Malik &#8211; Very good point, domain age is very important since this impacts the trust factor in the eyes of the search engines&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadab Malik</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/comment-page-1/#comment-50532</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadab Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5339#comment-50532</guid>
		<description>Well this all very logical. However, there is just too much theory on Links now. I can quote SEO giants and gurus offering advise of concentrating just on links for better rankings especially when its a new website. However, what I have been noticing is that SEO has become more of a domain age factor keeping every other aspect normally equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this all very logical. However, there is just too much theory on Links now. I can quote SEO giants and gurus offering advise of concentrating just on links for better rankings especially when its a new website. However, what I have been noticing is that SEO has become more of a domain age factor keeping every other aspect normally equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/28/links-important/comment-page-1/#comment-50432</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5339#comment-50432</guid>
		<description>@Christopher P West - Thanks for your question, here is a an entire post to answer your question...hope it helps!  :o)
http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/30/building-links-2/

@Jason - SEO Derby - Brooks - I agree with you 100%, you need both aspects as part of your total long term SEO effort, please refer to the last sentence in the post:
&quot;But if you do great on-page SEO then build solid links to those pages, you can do very well over time.&quot;

Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christopher P West &#8211; Thanks for your question, here is a an entire post to answer your question&#8230;hope it helps!  <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )<br />
<a href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/30/building-links-2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2009/06/30/building-links-2/</a></p>
<p>@Jason &#8211; SEO Derby &#8211; Brooks &#8211; I agree with you 100%, you need both aspects as part of your total long term SEO effort, please refer to the last sentence in the post:<br />
&#8220;But if you do great on-page SEO then build solid links to those pages, you can do very well over time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

