<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Google SEO Ranking Factors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Journal is an SEO Blog that contains usefule articles, tips, resources and news about SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: randy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/comment-page-3/#comment-910536</link>
		<dc:creator>randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=9952#comment-910536</guid>
		<description>wow!

A short and complete list of Ranking Factors....It really helps a lot.

Great Post!
2 thumbs up
Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow!</p>
<p>A short and complete list of Ranking Factors&#8230;.It really helps a lot.</p>
<p>Great Post!<br />
2 thumbs up<br />
Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamilton Switches</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/comment-page-3/#comment-897145</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Switches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=9952#comment-897145</guid>
		<description>The on page SEO effort and the quality of the link building really do go a long way in getting an SEO campaign working well. Of all the link building techniques, social bookmarking can work well if you target your keywords properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The on page SEO effort and the quality of the link building really do go a long way in getting an SEO campaign working well. Of all the link building techniques, social bookmarking can work well if you target your keywords properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posicionamiento de web</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/comment-page-2/#comment-786977</link>
		<dc:creator>Posicionamiento de web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=9952#comment-786977</guid>
		<description>Ist not easy to compete when you are a SEO, but the good thing is that all these litle things make you keep an open mind, working really really hard and to put your imagination (or creativity) to work. Ist not enought to wish to be the number onw, you alson need to be very patiente and work hard.... 

thanks for the article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ist not easy to compete when you are a SEO, but the good thing is that all these litle things make you keep an open mind, working really really hard and to put your imagination (or creativity) to work. Ist not enought to wish to be the number onw, you alson need to be very patiente and work hard&#8230;. </p>
<p>thanks for the article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ana</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/comment-page-2/#comment-532434</link>
		<dc:creator>ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=9952#comment-532434</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;ve spent almost 1 1/2 year optimizing our website and building links to it and I still don&#039;t get on first page of google.  But interestingly, I get Pagerank 4 for one of our sites.  I like your list, but I am beginning to believe that content - lots of it is the way to go after the Panda update and yes Trust!.

Thanks for the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent almost 1 1/2 year optimizing our website and building links to it and I still don&#8217;t get on first page of google.  But interestingly, I get Pagerank 4 for one of our sites.  I like your list, but I am beginning to believe that content &#8211; lots of it is the way to go after the Panda update and yes Trust!.</p>
<p>Thanks for the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cctv Installation</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/comment-page-2/#comment-450873</link>
		<dc:creator>Cctv Installation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 13:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=9952#comment-450873</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick 
Great clear information, I have found the domain age really affects ranking, so don&#039;t give up if you don&#039;t do well soon. Also research your market and make sure it is worth spending valuable time on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick<br />
Great clear information, I have found the domain age really affects ranking, so don&#8217;t give up if you don&#8217;t do well soon. Also research your market and make sure it is worth spending valuable time on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/comment-page-2/#comment-423582</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=9952#comment-423582</guid>
		<description>Could not agree to #10. There are too many examples that outbound links from unrelated sites helps rankings. DMOZ links to too many sites unrelated from DMOZ&#039;s perspective, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not agree to #10. There are too many examples that outbound links from unrelated sites helps rankings. DMOZ links to too many sites unrelated from DMOZ&#8217;s perspective, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Cawley</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/14/google-ranking-factors/comment-page-2/#comment-421817</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Cawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=9952#comment-421817</guid>
		<description>Excellent and sensible info.

We have struggled with seo and after 14 months have reached a Google Rank of 1 for the home page.

This is interesting as we now trade about 700 cottage bookings a year with 25 in-bound links.  One of our cottage members who started in 2007 has two cottages with one not active: www.ashtoncourtholidays.co.uk 

They have a google rank of 3.  Compared with a rank of 1 for www.countryholidaylets.co.uk this shows how important age of URL and presence on the web is.

We did not factor in free advertising through organic searches when we started out, had we relied on this, we wouldn&#039;t have survived.  Instead we spend heavily on Adwords which work well.

Google could easily abuse its dominant position... we feel it does not do this, but there are times when we do wonder when our perceived &#039;importance&#039; will eclipse that of Ashton Court Holidays.  (More power to their elbow)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent and sensible info.</p>
<p>We have struggled with seo and after 14 months have reached a Google Rank of 1 for the home page.</p>
<p>This is interesting as we now trade about 700 cottage bookings a year with 25 in-bound links.  One of our cottage members who started in 2007 has two cottages with one not active: <a href="http://www.ashtoncourtholidays.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.ashtoncourtholidays.co.uk</a> </p>
<p>They have a google rank of 3.  Compared with a rank of 1 for <a href="http://www.countryholidaylets.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.countryholidaylets.co.uk</a> this shows how important age of URL and presence on the web is.</p>
<p>We did not factor in free advertising through organic searches when we started out, had we relied on this, we wouldn&#8217;t have survived.  Instead we spend heavily on Adwords which work well.</p>
<p>Google could easily abuse its dominant position&#8230; we feel it does not do this, but there are times when we do wonder when our perceived &#8216;importance&#8217; will eclipse that of Ashton Court Holidays.  (More power to their elbow)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

