<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use Content to Help Visitors and Your SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/content-seo-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/content-seo-help/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Worstell</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/content-seo-help/comment-page-1/#comment-235903</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Worstell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=12652#comment-235903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was another useful post. Most of your posts aren&#039;t covered by anyone else, so it&#039;s refreshing to get links to these in my e-mails.

One interesting approach I&#039;ve run into recently (after I found that most blogs don&#039;t do static pages and most CMS&#039;s don&#039;t do blogs - well, there are exceptions...) - that you set up a CMS to do the organization for the site. These hold the valuable data that a business needs to continually brief their clients on. Then you cobble on a blog which takes care of the more time-sensitive data. The popular posts can then be copied (not moved - you lose your SEO love that was built-up; link it to your static page) when you find them.

But search engines love blogs, and customers like to find stuff they need all the time. So the marriage seems a nice little strategy. (Again, WP gets real stodgy if you try to do both on it - a few static pages seem OK, but it&#039;s really best as a blog.) You can also use low-overhead CMS (even static html pages for fast loading) as any sort of data-base driven blog has quite a bit of overhead to it.

Some ideas anyway...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was another useful post. Most of your posts aren&#8217;t covered by anyone else, so it&#8217;s refreshing to get links to these in my e-mails.</p>
<p>One interesting approach I&#8217;ve run into recently (after I found that most blogs don&#8217;t do static pages and most CMS&#8217;s don&#8217;t do blogs &#8211; well, there are exceptions&#8230;) &#8211; that you set up a CMS to do the organization for the site. These hold the valuable data that a business needs to continually brief their clients on. Then you cobble on a blog which takes care of the more time-sensitive data. The popular posts can then be copied (not moved &#8211; you lose your SEO love that was built-up; link it to your static page) when you find them.</p>
<p>But search engines love blogs, and customers like to find stuff they need all the time. So the marriage seems a nice little strategy. (Again, WP gets real stodgy if you try to do both on it &#8211; a few static pages seem OK, but it&#8217;s really best as a blog.) You can also use low-overhead CMS (even static html pages for fast loading) as any sort of data-base driven blog has quite a bit of overhead to it.</p>
<p>Some ideas anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South Bay Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/content-seo-help/comment-page-1/#comment-183183</link>
		<dc:creator>South Bay Search Engine Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=12652#comment-183183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, this post is very helpful for me since I want my blog to get some visitors also, and point here some very useful advise for optimizing my blog. I hope to read some more seo article from you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, this post is very helpful for me since I want my blog to get some visitors also, and point here some very useful advise for optimizing my blog. I hope to read some more seo article from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
