<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Good Quality Content Means</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117301</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Barbara, Veronica and Steven,
Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts!  I am glad you get so much out of my content!  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barbara, Veronica and Steven,<br />
Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts!  I am glad you get so much out of my content!  <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven W. Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117261</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven W. Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have enjoyed your articles and have learned things that have helped to make my little site better (at least I think so) lastpiner]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed your articles and have learned things that have helped to make my little site better (at least I think so) lastpiner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronica</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117234</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this article.

I think it is very useful, as the importance of good quality writing tends to be diminished, as a result of emphasizing the importance of links and linkbuilding. 

In fact, one is not more important than the other, they go hand in hand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this article.</p>
<p>I think it is very useful, as the importance of good quality writing tends to be diminished, as a result of emphasizing the importance of links and linkbuilding. </p>
<p>In fact, one is not more important than the other, they go hand in hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117132</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for answering the question of What is Good Content!  We keep hearing Content is King, but I, for one, have never read a good definition of what Good Content is!  Now that I have that understanding, I feel much more confident in writing, and in what I have written.  Thanks again!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for answering the question of What is Good Content!  We keep hearing Content is King, but I, for one, have never read a good definition of what Good Content is!  Now that I have that understanding, I feel much more confident in writing, and in what I have written.  Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enthusiast</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117117</link>
		<dc:creator>Enthusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, really out of the traditional thinking. M coming back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, really out of the traditional thinking. M coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117090</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally speaking, I agree with this article and also put into practice the two ways of generating good quality content shown above. 

However, it is also significant to choose some refined words/expressions and not to repeat the around 500 most used words. A particular expression, the combination of a specific verb with a noun and/or an adjective can really make the difference in the eyes of the search engines which praize an original text (in whatever context it is featured) also for its originality, refinement of style and quite rarely used lexicon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally speaking, I agree with this article and also put into practice the two ways of generating good quality content shown above. </p>
<p>However, it is also significant to choose some refined words/expressions and not to repeat the around 500 most used words. A particular expression, the combination of a specific verb with a noun and/or an adjective can really make the difference in the eyes of the search engines which praize an original text (in whatever context it is featured) also for its originality, refinement of style and quite rarely used lexicon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117054</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do these bloggers practice what they preach about quality not being important?

Or are they actually doing as you suggest by putting forward a contrary view. A fancyful unqualified opinion just to get a reaction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do these bloggers practice what they preach about quality not being important?</p>
<p>Or are they actually doing as you suggest by putting forward a contrary view. A fancyful unqualified opinion just to get a reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0-60</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-117031</link>
		<dc:creator>0-60</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=11160#comment-117031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if you write great content, but it&#039;s simply not the type of content that anyone would like to link to? Would you then recommend building links unnaturally via purchasing them from Justbacklinks.com or similar link building service?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you write great content, but it&#8217;s simply not the type of content that anyone would like to link to? Would you then recommend building links unnaturally via purchasing them from Justbacklinks.com or similar link building service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
