<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Social Search Is Now Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/google-social-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/google-social-search/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/google-social-search/comment-page-1/#comment-71887</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8729#comment-71887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tagg44,
You are very welcome...thanks for reading!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tagg44,<br />
You are very welcome&#8230;thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tag44</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/google-social-search/comment-page-1/#comment-71836</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8729#comment-71836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the post Nick and for sharing the information that Google Social Search is now live.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Nick and for sharing the information that Google Social Search is now live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/google-social-search/comment-page-1/#comment-71769</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8729#comment-71769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Lorraine,

Thanks for the comment!  It should be very interesting to see if Google social search really will work well long term and people adopt it or not...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lorraine,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!  It should be very interesting to see if Google social search really will work well long term and people adopt it or not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine Grula</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/google-social-search/comment-page-1/#comment-71755</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine Grula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8729#comment-71755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.  Google, the friendly proctoscope of the universe!  

It will take me a while before I decide whether I like this or not.  

Interesting how Matt Cutts says if you have information posted anywhere they look, then they assume you are 100% OK with them spreading the info around even more.  Then, he insists you have total control. Personally, I am not real comfortable with either of those statements. Even though I personally never visit sites I would be embarrassed about, (even in front of my very conservative granny) I sure worry about this wisdom of this.     

Does it REALLY add to the relevancy of my search to know that your friend of a friend of a friend found such-and-such?   

Thanks Nick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Google, the friendly proctoscope of the universe!  </p>
<p>It will take me a while before I decide whether I like this or not.  </p>
<p>Interesting how Matt Cutts says if you have information posted anywhere they look, then they assume you are 100% OK with them spreading the info around even more.  Then, he insists you have total control. Personally, I am not real comfortable with either of those statements. Even though I personally never visit sites I would be embarrassed about, (even in front of my very conservative granny) I sure worry about this wisdom of this.     </p>
<p>Does it REALLY add to the relevancy of my search to know that your friend of a friend of a friend found such-and-such?   </p>
<p>Thanks Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
