<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is Keyword Stuffing, Actually?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-53901</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5068#comment-53901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Anup Batra - Thanks for reading and your comment!  

If a page of a site already has a 2nd page position, then I would recommend to re-optimize naturally for highly relevant keyword phrases.  I don&#039;t EVER recommend that pages of content are ever written for search engines but should be written for your visitors to improve the user experience and provide value, etc...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anup Batra &#8211; Thanks for reading and your comment!  </p>
<p>If a page of a site already has a 2nd page position, then I would recommend to re-optimize naturally for highly relevant keyword phrases.  I don&#8217;t EVER recommend that pages of content are ever written for search engines but should be written for your visitors to improve the user experience and provide value, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup Batra</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-53892</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup Batra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5068#comment-53892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This information is handy! I think though that there need not be a a conflict between readability and keyword density. Nick, I think that a mediocre ranking page can be converted to a highly ranking page by rejigging the content, without meaninglessly adding keywords. The idea of creating a new page to do so does not always work, particularly if we are doing SEO for a highly competitive industry and the page we are working on is already on page 2. Would appreciate your thoughts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This information is handy! I think though that there need not be a a conflict between readability and keyword density. Nick, I think that a mediocre ranking page can be converted to a highly ranking page by rejigging the content, without meaninglessly adding keywords. The idea of creating a new page to do so does not always work, particularly if we are doing SEO for a highly competitive industry and the page we are working on is already on page 2. Would appreciate your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-48308</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5068#comment-48308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Joan Damico - Thanks so much for providing the checklist!  It is right on the money :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joan Damico &#8211; Thanks so much for providing the checklist!  It is right on the money <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Damico</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-48304</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Damico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5068#comment-48304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a B2B copywriter and marcom pro, keyword density is less important than good content that reads well.   Density is something I do at the very end of writing content, as a precaution to make sure I haven’t gone beyond the 3-5% density.   

My experience has been that when you focus on writing good content first, your keyword density naturally falls within the acceptable range.  I use a twofold process when writing for websites and SEO.  I first write the message and make sure that it reads well and resonates with the audience.  Then, I look at where the keywords are located instead of density.  Here’s a quick checklist:

•	Are most of the keywords toward the top of the page?
•	Are keywords located in H1-H3 header tags?
•	Are keywords in the “alt img” text?
•	Have I used keywords in anchor text? 
•	Have I placed keywords in bulleted lists?

Focusing on these techniques, more than keyword density, offer greater opportunity to boost natural search. 
@copywriter4u]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a B2B copywriter and marcom pro, keyword density is less important than good content that reads well.   Density is something I do at the very end of writing content, as a precaution to make sure I haven’t gone beyond the 3-5% density.   </p>
<p>My experience has been that when you focus on writing good content first, your keyword density naturally falls within the acceptable range.  I use a twofold process when writing for websites and SEO.  I first write the message and make sure that it reads well and resonates with the audience.  Then, I look at where the keywords are located instead of density.  Here’s a quick checklist:</p>
<p>•	Are most of the keywords toward the top of the page?<br />
•	Are keywords located in H1-H3 header tags?<br />
•	Are keywords in the “alt img” text?<br />
•	Have I used keywords in anchor text?<br />
•	Have I placed keywords in bulleted lists?</p>
<p>Focusing on these techniques, more than keyword density, offer greater opportunity to boost natural search.<br />
@copywriter4u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-48278</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5068#comment-48278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Agent SEO - Writing web content naturally for visitors always does much better from a user and search experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Agent SEO &#8211; Writing web content naturally for visitors always does much better from a user and search experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/keyword-stuffing/comment-page-1/#comment-48267</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5068#comment-48267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I try not to focus so much on density in terms of real percentages. I know it is important, however I prefer to write naturally so that my readers get a better experience. If you have something worth saying, then working in your target keywords shouldn&#039;t be a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try not to focus so much on density in terms of real percentages. I know it is important, however I prefer to write naturally so that my readers get a better experience. If you have something worth saying, then working in your target keywords shouldn&#8217;t be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
