<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Your Site Be Flagged for Over Optimization?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: If You Stay White Hat Then You Don&#8217;t Have to Fear Google&#8217;s Updates &#124; Daily SEO Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1115347</link>
		<dc:creator>If You Stay White Hat Then You Don&#8217;t Have to Fear Google&#8217;s Updates &#124; Daily SEO Tip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15967#comment-1115347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] quality tweaks. Google has also recently come out with some major algorithm updates, including the over optimization penalty and an attack on spammy blog networks. These are all quality updates following in the footsteps of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quality tweaks. Google has also recently come out with some major algorithm updates, including the over optimization penalty and an attack on spammy blog networks. These are all quality updates following in the footsteps of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Ways to Ruin the User Experience on Your Site</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1108098</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Ways to Ruin the User Experience on Your Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15967#comment-1108098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the cost of the user experience. Never over optimize your site; Google even recently announced an over optimization penalty for sites that take their SEO too far and forget the end user in their quest to dominate the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the cost of the user experience. Never over optimize your site; Google even recently announced an over optimization penalty for sites that take their SEO too far and forget the end user in their quest to dominate the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A UK Web design company</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1067808</link>
		<dc:creator>A UK Web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15967#comment-1067808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually I dont think it is quite as straight forward as that. 

First of all you need an agreed standard of what now constitutes &quot;White Hat SEO&quot; in Google&#039;s eyes. 

Besides the obvious of not using any form of cloaking, hidden text, or automated linking systems etc, there are lots of areas that are not so straight forward.

For example have you been trading links with other websites, Google may now consider this to be an attempt to manipulate PR. Have you been manually building links using your keywords as the anchor text for your links, (which of course almost everyone does, white hat, black hat or any other hat you like) Google now say that that is attempting to manipulate their results. 

So before smugly thinking to yourself, &quot;im ok ive only ever done White Hat SEO&quot; take another look at where Google have moved the goal posts to....

Most small companies wouldnt have a clue about doing White Hat SEO, or even what it means, so if any SEO way required they would still need to pay a company or professional to do it for them.

But what exactly is currently acceptable as white hat is very unclear, Google have lost a little bit of control recently. For example their Adwords team have been giving advice that totally contradicts the advice given by their spam control team, there are even lawsuits starting up over this. 

The lack of comunication within Google shows that it has got too big even for itself. They have forgotten that actually if it wasnt for us the website owns and the optimisation companies THEY wouldnt exist. They are trying to take over the rights to our work with their recent policy updates, and we seem to have forgotten that actually they are just a middle man between our websites and products and the internet users. Google are not the only option, perhaps we need to start looking elsewhere.

I think that many SEO companies are hoping that BING or another Search Engine will step up and take over from Google and bring them back down to earth with a bump.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I dont think it is quite as straight forward as that. </p>
<p>First of all you need an agreed standard of what now constitutes &#8220;White Hat SEO&#8221; in Google&#8217;s eyes. </p>
<p>Besides the obvious of not using any form of cloaking, hidden text, or automated linking systems etc, there are lots of areas that are not so straight forward.</p>
<p>For example have you been trading links with other websites, Google may now consider this to be an attempt to manipulate PR. Have you been manually building links using your keywords as the anchor text for your links, (which of course almost everyone does, white hat, black hat or any other hat you like) Google now say that that is attempting to manipulate their results. </p>
<p>So before smugly thinking to yourself, &#8220;im ok ive only ever done White Hat SEO&#8221; take another look at where Google have moved the goal posts to&#8230;.</p>
<p>Most small companies wouldnt have a clue about doing White Hat SEO, or even what it means, so if any SEO way required they would still need to pay a company or professional to do it for them.</p>
<p>But what exactly is currently acceptable as white hat is very unclear, Google have lost a little bit of control recently. For example their Adwords team have been giving advice that totally contradicts the advice given by their spam control team, there are even lawsuits starting up over this. </p>
<p>The lack of comunication within Google shows that it has got too big even for itself. They have forgotten that actually if it wasnt for us the website owns and the optimisation companies THEY wouldnt exist. They are trying to take over the rights to our work with their recent policy updates, and we seem to have forgotten that actually they are just a middle man between our websites and products and the internet users. Google are not the only option, perhaps we need to start looking elsewhere.</p>
<p>I think that many SEO companies are hoping that BING or another Search Engine will step up and take over from Google and bring them back down to earth with a bump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO services Philippines</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1067324</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO services Philippines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 06:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15967#comment-1067324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Nick,

Great article. Yes, you&#039;re right, SEO will be dinosaurs without Google (and other search engines of course !)

The first time I heard about the &#039;over optimization&#039; issue was from a podcast sent to me by a fellow SEO. It was an SXSW event.

Personally, if you are doing White Hat, you won&#039;t be affected by the pending algorithm update.Keyword stuffing are considered black hat, that may fall under &#039;over optimization&#039;.

The intention of the update is acceptable. Even though you don&#039;t have money to pay for an SEO firm, you can still compete with bigger budgeted campaign by just doing white hat SEO. Even though you have a &#039;mom-and-pop&#039;website, you can still be number 1 in SERPs. If you have good content and a campaign plan, page one rankings is not a dream.

Regards,

Engr Castro
PS Please allow me to retweet this. Tnx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Nick,</p>
<p>Great article. Yes, you&#8217;re right, SEO will be dinosaurs without Google (and other search engines of course !)</p>
<p>The first time I heard about the &#8216;over optimization&#8217; issue was from a podcast sent to me by a fellow SEO. It was an SXSW event.</p>
<p>Personally, if you are doing White Hat, you won&#8217;t be affected by the pending algorithm update.Keyword stuffing are considered black hat, that may fall under &#8216;over optimization&#8217;.</p>
<p>The intention of the update is acceptable. Even though you don&#8217;t have money to pay for an SEO firm, you can still compete with bigger budgeted campaign by just doing white hat SEO. Even though you have a &#8216;mom-and-pop&#8217;website, you can still be number 1 in SERPs. If you have good content and a campaign plan, page one rankings is not a dream.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Engr Castro<br />
PS Please allow me to retweet this. Tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1066671</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15967#comment-1066671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Marnie for reading and your comment!

Take Care,
Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Marnie for reading and your comment!</p>
<p>Take Care,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marnie Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1066667</link>
		<dc:creator>Marnie Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15967#comment-1066667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great post, Nick. Thanks for reminding people that making a great website geared toward helping and serving their customers is the foundation of smart SEO. No tricks, no voodoo - just good content, real links and believable social conversations. Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post, Nick. Thanks for reminding people that making a great website geared toward helping and serving their customers is the foundation of smart SEO. No tricks, no voodoo &#8211; just good content, real links and believable social conversations. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meenakshi venkatramn</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/over-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1055659</link>
		<dc:creator>meenakshi venkatramn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15967#comment-1055659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes.It is true. People practicing white hat SEO techniques  and promoting their clientele&#039;s websites on a low budget, can get real benefits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.It is true. People practicing white hat SEO techniques  and promoting their clientele&#8217;s websites on a low budget, can get real benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
