<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panda 2.2 is Just Around the Corner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/comment-page-1/#comment-427825</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=14510#comment-427825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[much needed improvement - for us it&#039;s been particularly frustrating with press releases for clients but across the board this will make for a more effective user experience.  How do you expect it to roll out locally vs. on a global scale?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much needed improvement &#8211; for us it&#8217;s been particularly frustrating with press releases for clients but across the board this will make for a more effective user experience.  How do you expect it to roll out locally vs. on a global scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/comment-page-1/#comment-420676</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=14510#comment-420676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Mike for checking in, sharing your thoughts about the Google Panda update...

Take Care,
Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike for checking in, sharing your thoughts about the Google Panda update&#8230;</p>
<p>Take Care,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/comment-page-1/#comment-420305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=14510#comment-420305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can&#039;t do it.  That&#039;s the bottom line.  They can&#039;t just apply any standard, I don&#039;t care how good the algorithm is and weed out who&#039;s content is who&#039;s.  The don&#039;t actually index every article that is written and published online now.  Too much processing power.  They have some awesome computers, but you have to look at the reality of how long it takes super computers to just read DNA. 

Google is no different.  They can&#039;t ready through a Trillion or more websites and all content and figure out who did what first.  I call it impossible as this is a human factor.  They have some smart people there, but they are not that smart.  They will get some more of the dummies, but they will hit good sites again.

I have over 140 Auto Blogs and about 50-60 of those sites are really bad with duplicate content and after all the updates, Farmer, Panda, whatever; everything that wasn&#039;t already ranked high, moved up even higher in the Rankings.

There are too many factors here.  In 5, 6, 7 years I still don&#039;t think they will be able to do it.  Why?  Privacy, Trademarks, and the Internet is not Googles.  The Internet is an International commodity, not just a hub for Google.com and they know it.  That and International Law and Personal Privacy Restrictions will always be in their way and there is always that one little thing called Monoploization that Microsoft and other Companies will not let Google have.  I think they spend more time in the courts now that they do anything else.

Look at the Personal Information scraper called Google Chrome, they will have more court battles that will keep them at bay.

I don&#039;t like crap sites anymore than anyone else, but until they invent a tagging system for content, this is the way it will be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can&#8217;t do it.  That&#8217;s the bottom line.  They can&#8217;t just apply any standard, I don&#8217;t care how good the algorithm is and weed out who&#8217;s content is who&#8217;s.  The don&#8217;t actually index every article that is written and published online now.  Too much processing power.  They have some awesome computers, but you have to look at the reality of how long it takes super computers to just read DNA. </p>
<p>Google is no different.  They can&#8217;t ready through a Trillion or more websites and all content and figure out who did what first.  I call it impossible as this is a human factor.  They have some smart people there, but they are not that smart.  They will get some more of the dummies, but they will hit good sites again.</p>
<p>I have over 140 Auto Blogs and about 50-60 of those sites are really bad with duplicate content and after all the updates, Farmer, Panda, whatever; everything that wasn&#8217;t already ranked high, moved up even higher in the Rankings.</p>
<p>There are too many factors here.  In 5, 6, 7 years I still don&#8217;t think they will be able to do it.  Why?  Privacy, Trademarks, and the Internet is not Googles.  The Internet is an International commodity, not just a hub for Google.com and they know it.  That and International Law and Personal Privacy Restrictions will always be in their way and there is always that one little thing called Monoploization that Microsoft and other Companies will not let Google have.  I think they spend more time in the courts now that they do anything else.</p>
<p>Look at the Personal Information scraper called Google Chrome, they will have more court battles that will keep them at bay.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like crap sites anymore than anyone else, but until they invent a tagging system for content, this is the way it will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/comment-page-1/#comment-419742</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=14510#comment-419742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s about time. being that I have a hard enough time writing good content and trying to rank it sure seems  unjust to have other people ranking for just rehashing the same content.

Thanks for the article nicely done and to the point.

Kevin Taylor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time. being that I have a hard enough time writing good content and trying to rank it sure seems  unjust to have other people ranking for just rehashing the same content.</p>
<p>Thanks for the article nicely done and to the point.</p>
<p>Kevin Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddha Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/comment-page-1/#comment-419730</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddha Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=14510#comment-419730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i applaud google&#039;s efforts.. although i think it&#039;s terrible that some site owners seem to have been negatively effected when not deserving.. hopefully they get that squared away, but overall i think any update which rewards original content &amp; human effort is a good thing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i applaud google&#8217;s efforts.. although i think it&#8217;s terrible that some site owners seem to have been negatively effected when not deserving.. hopefully they get that squared away, but overall i think any update which rewards original content &amp; human effort is a good thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/panda-2-update/comment-page-1/#comment-419243</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=14510#comment-419243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spammers should be punished. I welcome this update and will be waiting for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spammers should be punished. I welcome this update and will be waiting for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
