<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Fair To Use Other Brands To Promote Oneself?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/promote-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/promote-brands/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/promote-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2007/08/10/is-it-fair-to-use-other-brands-to-promote-oneself/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My take on it is simple.  If those companies don&#039;t have what it takes to step up to the plate and play the game, then more power to ya.

If they don&#039;t want you to bid on those terms, they should raise their bid, run multiple campaigns, and protect their terms.  If it were me, I&#039;d do what I could do to put you so far back in the results and so expensive to work my name that you would seek other prey.

So I think what you&#039;re doing in this regard is excellent.  It promotes more advertising, HIGHER paying advertising to be more specific, and more PPC money in the overall kitty.  Which in turn means higher PPC payouts to those running click ad sites and affiliate related pages.  Overall, it puts more money in the stream for everyone.

Keep on keepin&#039; on!

Chuck Crawford
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on it is simple.  If those companies don&#8217;t have what it takes to step up to the plate and play the game, then more power to ya.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t want you to bid on those terms, they should raise their bid, run multiple campaigns, and protect their terms.  If it were me, I&#8217;d do what I could do to put you so far back in the results and so expensive to work my name that you would seek other prey.</p>
<p>So I think what you&#8217;re doing in this regard is excellent.  It promotes more advertising, HIGHER paying advertising to be more specific, and more PPC money in the overall kitty.  Which in turn means higher PPC payouts to those running click ad sites and affiliate related pages.  Overall, it puts more money in the stream for everyone.</p>
<p>Keep on keepin&#8217; on!</p>
<p>Chuck Crawford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Saccone</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/promote-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Saccone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2007/08/10/is-it-fair-to-use-other-brands-to-promote-oneself/#comment-1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It certainly would seem that people have found you, Mr. Stamoulis. 

Without being sleazy or trash talking any of your competitors, you&#039;ve simply made visitors aware of another option that&#039;s available to them in the world of SEM services. For everyone posting on this topic here and in the rest of the blogosphere, this is our business so everyone obviously has a strong opinion.

In brick and mortar, companies spend endless resources to position their brand next to - or better yet - in front of/above their competitors in the supermarket aisle, at the bar, in the strip mall, at tradeshows, etc. Kudos to you for incorporating this competitive PPC method to acquire customers.

Just searching &#039;Commission Junction&#039; I found at least 15 other CPA/rev-share programs bidding on that branded keyword.  Searching &#039;Constant Contact&#039; there are the same number of companies offering email marketing software.  You&#039;ve gotta love competition; it&#039;s why we&#039;re all employed!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly would seem that people have found you, Mr. Stamoulis. </p>
<p>Without being sleazy or trash talking any of your competitors, you&#8217;ve simply made visitors aware of another option that&#8217;s available to them in the world of SEM services. For everyone posting on this topic here and in the rest of the blogosphere, this is our business so everyone obviously has a strong opinion.</p>
<p>In brick and mortar, companies spend endless resources to position their brand next to &#8211; or better yet &#8211; in front of/above their competitors in the supermarket aisle, at the bar, in the strip mall, at tradeshows, etc. Kudos to you for incorporating this competitive PPC method to acquire customers.</p>
<p>Just searching &#8216;Commission Junction&#8217; I found at least 15 other CPA/rev-share programs bidding on that branded keyword.  Searching &#8216;Constant Contact&#8217; there are the same number of companies offering email marketing software.  You&#8217;ve gotta love competition; it&#8217;s why we&#8217;re all employed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/promote-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2007/08/10/is-it-fair-to-use-other-brands-to-promote-oneself/#comment-1013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s strange. I don&#039;t see why advertising under your competitors names is un-ethical. As long as you are not being deceptive, or saying nasty stuff about your competitors...

Some people have the idea that ethical business means you can&#039;t &quot;infringe&quot; upon your competitors&#039; customers, while other people subscribe to the &quot;it ain&#039;t illegal if you don&#039;t get caught philosophy. Bah.

I say that as far as ethics are concerned, being honest, obeying the laws, and keeping contracts/TOS goes a LONG way. Yeh, that pretty handles it, I think. Many would disagree, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s strange. I don&#8217;t see why advertising under your competitors names is un-ethical. As long as you are not being deceptive, or saying nasty stuff about your competitors&#8230;</p>
<p>Some people have the idea that ethical business means you can&#8217;t &#8220;infringe&#8221; upon your competitors&#8217; customers, while other people subscribe to the &#8220;it ain&#8217;t illegal if you don&#8217;t get caught philosophy. Bah.</p>
<p>I say that as far as ethics are concerned, being honest, obeying the laws, and keeping contracts/TOS goes a LONG way. Yeh, that pretty handles it, I think. Many would disagree, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
