<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why ROI Is More Important Than Visitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/roi-visitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/roi-visitors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/roi-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-72699</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8796#comment-72699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bob,
Excellent points!  I could not agree with you more!  Some of the best ecommerce websites provide good quality, priced products but do often provide a very customized and customer centric shopping experience.  Sites such as Amazon and Zappos come to my mind as excellent customer focused sites that go beyond generating excellent ROI, simply put they create a good shopping experience.

Anyway, thanks for your insights and your comment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,<br />
Excellent points!  I could not agree with you more!  Some of the best ecommerce websites provide good quality, priced products but do often provide a very customized and customer centric shopping experience.  Sites such as Amazon and Zappos come to my mind as excellent customer focused sites that go beyond generating excellent ROI, simply put they create a good shopping experience.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for your insights and your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Viney</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/roi-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-72693</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Viney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8796#comment-72693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always work on the goals of getting traffic to the website and then deriving commercial value from the traffic on the website as two distinct objectives, with many times separate but obviously congruent strategies, separate actions and separate measures of success.  Targeting helps of course, but we as an industry have focused almost exclusively on targeting and not nearly enough on changing the marketing approach.

Digital, interactive channels provide the opportunity to be more truly customer-centric, by focusing the approach to the customer on the website on providing a solution to their needs, and not just modeling what the next most likely product to purchase might be.  Commercializing an audience requires an approach focused on building a relationship and not merely generating a transaction.  That means utilizing automated interactions to assess customer needs and preferences, not just model them based on observed behavior.

Most retail-based web sites are organized very much like digital product catalogs . .. they say &quot;here&#039;s what we have to sell,  here&#039;s what&#039;s on sale, here&#039;s an offer you might find relevant&quot;.  Targeting helps this approach be more effective, no doubt.

But suppose the site was organized around needs . . . and asked &quot;what would you like to buy today, what&#039;s on your shopping list, how can we help you?&quot;  That approach requires a very different kind of automated experience and back-end.  It&#039;s not rocket science, but it seems to be from another planet!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always work on the goals of getting traffic to the website and then deriving commercial value from the traffic on the website as two distinct objectives, with many times separate but obviously congruent strategies, separate actions and separate measures of success.  Targeting helps of course, but we as an industry have focused almost exclusively on targeting and not nearly enough on changing the marketing approach.</p>
<p>Digital, interactive channels provide the opportunity to be more truly customer-centric, by focusing the approach to the customer on the website on providing a solution to their needs, and not just modeling what the next most likely product to purchase might be.  Commercializing an audience requires an approach focused on building a relationship and not merely generating a transaction.  That means utilizing automated interactions to assess customer needs and preferences, not just model them based on observed behavior.</p>
<p>Most retail-based web sites are organized very much like digital product catalogs . .. they say &#8220;here&#8217;s what we have to sell,  here&#8217;s what&#8217;s on sale, here&#8217;s an offer you might find relevant&#8221;.  Targeting helps this approach be more effective, no doubt.</p>
<p>But suppose the site was organized around needs . . . and asked &#8220;what would you like to buy today, what&#8217;s on your shopping list, how can we help you?&#8221;  That approach requires a very different kind of automated experience and back-end.  It&#8217;s not rocket science, but it seems to be from another planet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/roi-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-71382</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8796#comment-71382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Social8Media,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and your comments with our readers...take care!  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Social8Media,<br />
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and your comments with our readers&#8230;take care!  <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social8Media</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/roi-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-71229</link>
		<dc:creator>Social8Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=8796#comment-71229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a talk given most recently in Shanghai Dr. McDougall introduced the term Return on Participation(ROP). It has three significant sentiment, reach and authority. I tend to agree with this approach more than simply stating ROI. And obviously making a profit is the bottom line but if you look at some of the efforts and how people are using their websites it is not only for online purchases where you can see direct relationships between marketing efforts and purchases, but there are also campaigns where this cannot be measured. There are campaigns for musicians who are looking at ROP more so than selling their music. And for many of them there are multiple sites where they sell their music so it is difficult to track back to which campaign had the most impact. Local events also run into the same issue where they realize that they have more people in attendance but they cannot attribute which marketing campaign had the most influence. With ROP you can see this in effect doe to tools available to track these campaigns. One such tool I use is Raven to help me better understand my efforts and deliver these results to clients.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a talk given most recently in Shanghai Dr. McDougall introduced the term Return on Participation(ROP). It has three significant sentiment, reach and authority. I tend to agree with this approach more than simply stating ROI. And obviously making a profit is the bottom line but if you look at some of the efforts and how people are using their websites it is not only for online purchases where you can see direct relationships between marketing efforts and purchases, but there are also campaigns where this cannot be measured. There are campaigns for musicians who are looking at ROP more so than selling their music. And for many of them there are multiple sites where they sell their music so it is difficult to track back to which campaign had the most impact. Local events also run into the same issue where they realize that they have more people in attendance but they cannot attribute which marketing campaign had the most influence. With ROP you can see this in effect doe to tools available to track these campaigns. One such tool I use is Raven to help me better understand my efforts and deliver these results to clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
