<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Rankings Are Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting Controversial with Your Content</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1044753</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Controversial with Your Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-1044753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] few weeks ago I wrote a post for the Search Engine Optimization Journal called “Search Rankings a Dead.” I wrote it because I was inspired by the topic of another blog post I had found on Search [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few weeks ago I wrote a post for the Search Engine Optimization Journal called “Search Rankings a Dead.” I wrote it because I was inspired by the topic of another blog post I had found on Search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas J. Towler</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1035563</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas J. Towler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-1035563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been focusing a lot with rankings and it helps me with my SEO job. Didn&#039;t realize that it’s more important to focus on visitor growth. 

Your post is very informative and I’m very thankful for learning about this article. 

Thanks again!
Thomas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been focusing a lot with rankings and it helps me with my SEO job. Didn&#8217;t realize that it’s more important to focus on visitor growth. </p>
<p>Your post is very informative and I’m very thankful for learning about this article. </p>
<p>Thanks again!<br />
Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jedda</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1005555</link>
		<dc:creator>Jedda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-1005555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really interesting debate here.  I think Onder&#039;s points are good too.  Yes, it is about increasing visitor numbers and SEO has not been the only way to do this.  And building a business on one strategy is definitely flawed.

But in the end, people don&#039;t go past the first page of search results (many not past the first listing), so ranking will continue to matter to anyone with a website.  The more niche the market (assuming that means smaller), the more important it is to be the number one listing.  So ranking 1st continues to be really important.  Of course you could get that ranking through Places listings and in fact that could be a whole lot easier.  

Just shows that local businesses are likely to be the winners in Google&#039;s quest to personalise everything to the nth degree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting debate here.  I think Onder&#8217;s points are good too.  Yes, it is about increasing visitor numbers and SEO has not been the only way to do this.  And building a business on one strategy is definitely flawed.</p>
<p>But in the end, people don&#8217;t go past the first page of search results (many not past the first listing), so ranking will continue to matter to anyone with a website.  The more niche the market (assuming that means smaller), the more important it is to be the number one listing.  So ranking 1st continues to be really important.  Of course you could get that ranking through Places listings and in fact that could be a whole lot easier.  </p>
<p>Just shows that local businesses are likely to be the winners in Google&#8217;s quest to personalise everything to the nth degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-999853</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-999853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks everyone for your comments!  :)

Take Care,
Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone for your comments!  <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Take Care,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Create Quiz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-999823</link>
		<dc:creator>Create Quiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-999823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You’ve said it all beautifully and I am agree with you. Thanks for sharing this post because this post is really effective and knowledge full. I am very inspired. 
Keep it up.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’ve said it all beautifully and I am agree with you. Thanks for sharing this post because this post is really effective and knowledge full. I am very inspired.<br />
Keep it up&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen MacCannell</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-999781</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen MacCannell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-999781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bottom line is that those of us in the SEO software business have to keep on developing our tools to reflect the changing search experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line is that those of us in the SEO software business have to keep on developing our tools to reflect the changing search experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-998839</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-998839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marcus, though you are correct and I agree with you that rankings are not &quot;dead&quot; you cannot discount what Nick is doing in the article beyond delivering the content and information. He has to also make it interesting, maybe even a little controversial (like this article) so that people will actually want to read his content. With a title like “How to Combat Personalization and Retain Your Rankings / Obtain Visibility” I would maybe read it, maybe not depending on how much I needed to know about the &#039;how-to&#039; topic at the time. However, with a title like &quot;Search Rankings Are Dead&quot; then whoa! wait a minute, I HAVE to read that! You cannot discount the marketing factor. With our short short short attention spans these days, you have to have a catchy title to draw people in or they&#039;ll never even give it a chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus, though you are correct and I agree with you that rankings are not &#8220;dead&#8221; you cannot discount what Nick is doing in the article beyond delivering the content and information. He has to also make it interesting, maybe even a little controversial (like this article) so that people will actually want to read his content. With a title like “How to Combat Personalization and Retain Your Rankings / Obtain Visibility” I would maybe read it, maybe not depending on how much I needed to know about the &#8216;how-to&#8217; topic at the time. However, with a title like &#8220;Search Rankings Are Dead&#8221; then whoa! wait a minute, I HAVE to read that! You cannot discount the marketing factor. With our short short short attention spans these days, you have to have a catchy title to draw people in or they&#8217;ll never even give it a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onder</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-998599</link>
		<dc:creator>Onder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-998599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always felt confused as to which direction to take with regards to building a business. Coming from an Internet marketing background where &#039;link building&#039; is key to growth. I&#039;ve felt very confused as to who to listen to. So many people are advising different things with regards to traffic generation. 

Some people say it&#039;s all about the brand, others say it&#039;s all about the keywords and SEO.

In all honesty, i think neither one of these matter. I&#039;ve come to the personal conclusion that as soon as you place a direct emphasis on a given strategy or technique, everything about your business will begin to fall apart because it&#039;s simply a poor foundation and mindset to be coming from.

I think if we start to approach it more along the lines of how actual traditional business people think (Treat the customer with care and provide value), you will set yourself up with a solid foundation for a future proofed and reputable business.

It&#039;s simply a matter of time before all of this gets recognised by the online community. The Internet and the search engines are simply a tool to help aid your business and not the magic bullet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always felt confused as to which direction to take with regards to building a business. Coming from an Internet marketing background where &#8216;link building&#8217; is key to growth. I&#8217;ve felt very confused as to who to listen to. So many people are advising different things with regards to traffic generation. </p>
<p>Some people say it&#8217;s all about the brand, others say it&#8217;s all about the keywords and SEO.</p>
<p>In all honesty, i think neither one of these matter. I&#8217;ve come to the personal conclusion that as soon as you place a direct emphasis on a given strategy or technique, everything about your business will begin to fall apart because it&#8217;s simply a poor foundation and mindset to be coming from.</p>
<p>I think if we start to approach it more along the lines of how actual traditional business people think (Treat the customer with care and provide value), you will set yourself up with a solid foundation for a future proofed and reputable business.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simply a matter of time before all of this gets recognised by the online community. The Internet and the search engines are simply a tool to help aid your business and not the magic bullet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mashilo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-998078</link>
		<dc:creator>mashilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-998078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great debate guys, it just goes to show how broad SEO is. what works for you might not work for someone else,but the most important thing is the traffic and the conversions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great debate guys, it just goes to show how broad SEO is. what works for you might not work for someone else,but the most important thing is the traffic and the conversions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-998073</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-998073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to say something similar to what Marcus said,b ut he covered most of my viewpoints already.

However I would like to add one. Just because &quot;social signals&quot; are now impacting serps, that doesn&#039;t equate to rankings being dead? We will still have the rankings, We will need to be more involved in social to impact rankings in the future, but that just doesn&#039;t equate to rankings being dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say something similar to what Marcus said,b ut he covered most of my viewpoints already.</p>
<p>However I would like to add one. Just because &#8220;social signals&#8221; are now impacting serps, that doesn&#8217;t equate to rankings being dead? We will still have the rankings, We will need to be more involved in social to impact rankings in the future, but that just doesn&#8217;t equate to rankings being dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-998071</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-998071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While what you say it partly true, rankings are still very important. For a huge amount of search terms the vast majority f people will see the same website at No. 1. For all my sites the traffic I get correlates with the ranking position. If a site is popular then it will rank well for lots of reason, so of course it&#039;s relevant. It&#039;s not like it used to be, but it&#039;s still very similar. People are always to quick to think things have changing. Yes, social media&#039;s playing a bigger part these days, but backlinks still work very well and are far from dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While what you say it partly true, rankings are still very important. For a huge amount of search terms the vast majority f people will see the same website at No. 1. For all my sites the traffic I get correlates with the ranking position. If a site is popular then it will rank well for lots of reason, so of course it&#8217;s relevant. It&#8217;s not like it used to be, but it&#8217;s still very similar. People are always to quick to think things have changing. Yes, social media&#8217;s playing a bigger part these days, but backlinks still work very well and are far from dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-997921</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-997921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No problem, 

Thanks for publishing :) Best of Luck!  

I was just picked up on my use of effective and affective by a team mate...  Terrible grammar... :(  Rant ruined...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, </p>
<p>Thanks for publishing <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Best of Luck!  </p>
<p>I was just picked up on my use of effective and affective by a team mate&#8230;  Terrible grammar&#8230; <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Rant ruined&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-997909</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-997909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Marcus for sharing your rant!  :)  

You make some great points.

Thanks again &amp; take care,
Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Marcus for sharing your rant!  <img src='http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>You make some great points.</p>
<p>Thanks again &#038; take care,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/search-rankings-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-997864</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=15857#comment-997864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Nick...

It&#039;s morning, so this could come across aggressive...

Right, Rankings aren&#039;t dead, and reports certainly aren&#039;t.

Rankings give a good average, they also directly correlate to the amount of traffic you receive for particular terms.  Sure that number will drop, but don&#039;t forget that not everyone is going to have personalised search...  People won&#039;t always be +1 &quot;ing&quot; websites, and rankings for the moment, won&#039;t be drastically effected.

In fact, I think you will find that any #1 rankings terms that you do have, probably receive a similar amount of traffic that they used to, same goes for all terms that have been in the same position on page 1 for a year.

This is an SEO&#039;s way of attempting to bridge a gap between SEO and UX, where in all actuality there is no gap.

By stating that some sources of SEO are irrelevant, pointless or &quot;DEAD&quot; shows you are trying to push yourself into another sector, that you don&#039;t need pushing into...

Instead use your brain to explain to clients or prospective clients how SEO can encompass a large amount of other areas within online, and dear god, don&#039;t say something is &quot;DEAD&quot;...

Jesus...  Page Rank &quot;Died&quot; a long time ago didn&#039;t it?  Oh wait, people still use it everyday...

Also, wouldn&#039;t a more helpful and proactive way of titling this be &quot;How to Combat Personalization and Retain Your Rankings / Obtain Visibility&quot;...

Also...  Google local results are rankings!  How about helping to improve those too...  

As for the Social Signals...  Jesus, why not provide information on how to improve rankings in this sector.

Even if rankings are not as &quot;important&quot; as they used to be, they are still there, definitelty not dead, and reports can still provide useful information.

Rant Over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s morning, so this could come across aggressive&#8230;</p>
<p>Right, Rankings aren&#8217;t dead, and reports certainly aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Rankings give a good average, they also directly correlate to the amount of traffic you receive for particular terms.  Sure that number will drop, but don&#8217;t forget that not everyone is going to have personalised search&#8230;  People won&#8217;t always be +1 &#8220;ing&#8221; websites, and rankings for the moment, won&#8217;t be drastically effected.</p>
<p>In fact, I think you will find that any #1 rankings terms that you do have, probably receive a similar amount of traffic that they used to, same goes for all terms that have been in the same position on page 1 for a year.</p>
<p>This is an SEO&#8217;s way of attempting to bridge a gap between SEO and UX, where in all actuality there is no gap.</p>
<p>By stating that some sources of SEO are irrelevant, pointless or &#8220;DEAD&#8221; shows you are trying to push yourself into another sector, that you don&#8217;t need pushing into&#8230;</p>
<p>Instead use your brain to explain to clients or prospective clients how SEO can encompass a large amount of other areas within online, and dear god, don&#8217;t say something is &#8220;DEAD&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Jesus&#8230;  Page Rank &#8220;Died&#8221; a long time ago didn&#8217;t it?  Oh wait, people still use it everyday&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, wouldn&#8217;t a more helpful and proactive way of titling this be &#8220;How to Combat Personalization and Retain Your Rankings / Obtain Visibility&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Also&#8230;  Google local results are rankings!  How about helping to improve those too&#8230;  </p>
<p>As for the Social Signals&#8230;  Jesus, why not provide information on how to improve rankings in this sector.</p>
<p>Even if rankings are not as &#8220;important&#8221; as they used to be, they are still there, definitelty not dead, and reports can still provide useful information.</p>
<p>Rant Over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
