<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does SEO Have A Future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/seo-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/seo-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:06:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/seo-future/comment-page-1/#comment-62985</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5730#comment-62985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Daryl - Excellent points!  Thanks for the comment and reading!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daryl &#8211; Excellent points!  Thanks for the comment and reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/seo-future/comment-page-1/#comment-62969</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/?p=5730#comment-62969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with Rand. IMO Social Media is just another result similar to current Universal Results. When relevant the Social Media result will appear in the rankings. This is particularly true for brand searches. Social media results will seldom offer relevancy if the users query is informational, navigational or transactional in nature, therefore it will just be another sub-segment of search results not the primary results that people will see for most queries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Rand. IMO Social Media is just another result similar to current Universal Results. When relevant the Social Media result will appear in the rankings. This is particularly true for brand searches. Social media results will seldom offer relevancy if the users query is informational, navigational or transactional in nature, therefore it will just be another sub-segment of search results not the primary results that people will see for most queries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
